19 research outputs found

    Muscle activation during gait in children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy

    Get PDF
    The aim of this prospective study was to investigate changes in muscle activity during gait in children with Duchenne muscular Dystrophy (DMD). Dynamic surface electromyography recordings (EMGs) of 16 children with DMD and pathological gait were compared with those of 15 control children. The activity of the rectus femoris (RF), vastus lateralis (VL), medial hamstrings (HS), tibialis anterior (TA) and gastrocnemius soleus (GAS) muscles was recorded and analysed quantitatively and qualitatively. The overall muscle activity in the children with DMD was significantly different from that of the control group. Percentage activation amplitudes of RF, HS and TA were greater throughout the gait cycle in the children with DMD and the timing of GAS activity differed from the control children. Significantly greater muscle coactivation was found in the children with DMD. There were no significant differences between sides. Since the motor command is normal in DMD, the hyper-activity and co-contractions likely compensate for gait instability and muscle weakness, however may have negative consequences on the muscles and may increase the energy cost of gait. Simple rehabilitative strategies such as targeted physical therapies may improve stability and thus the pattern of muscle activity

    Les effets de l’invitation europĂ©enne Ă  agir sur la conciliation emploi-famille: une analyse comparĂ©e de la nĂ©gociation collectiveen France et au Luxembourg

    No full text
    International audienceL’article s’interroge sur l’effectivitĂ© de l’invitation faite par les instances europĂ©ennes aux États membres et aux partenaires sociaux d’agir en faveur d’une meilleureconciliation de la vie professionnelle et de la vie familiale, notamment Ă  travers le dialogue social. Il Ă©tudie plus prĂ©cisĂ©ment la rĂ©ponse des partenaires sociaux dansle cadre de deux pays, la France et le Luxembourg, prĂ©sentant une convention de genre et un systĂšme de relations professionnelles bien diffĂ©renciĂ©s. AprĂšs avoir explicitĂ©la nature de l’invitation europĂ©enne et ses dĂ©clinaisons institutionnelles en France et au Luxembourg, l’article procĂšde Ă  une analyse exploratoire du produit dela nĂ©gociation collective aux niveaux de la branche et de l’entreprise sur la base d’un Ă©chantillon comparable en France et au Luxembourg. La question qui est posĂ©e estplus prĂ©cisĂ©ment d’apprĂ©cier sous quelle forme et avec quel contenu la thĂ©matique de la conciliation emploi-famille a Ă©tĂ© nĂ©gociĂ©e dans cet Ă©chantillon restreint, pourmieux en saisir la portĂ©e, en rapportant ces rĂ©sultats Ă  la diversitĂ© des dispositifs institutionnels existants

    Architectural reorganization of the nuclei upon transfer into oocytes accompanies genome reprogramming

    No full text
    International audienceThe ability of cloned embryos to sustain full-term development depends on the ability of the recipient ooplasm to reprogram the donor cell genome. As the nuclear architecture has recently emerged as a key-factor in the regulation of gene expression, we questioned whether early embryos obtained from transfer of ES metaphasic chromosomes into mouse ooplasm would adopt the somatic or embryonic type of nuclear organization. We have particularly focused on the arrangement of chromosomal territories with respect to the nucleolar compartment, and the pericentric heterochromatin domains called chromocenters. We found that nuclear transfer triggers profound chromatin rearrangements including the dispersion of the donor cell chromocenters components. These rearrangements lead to a typical 1-cell pronuclear organization, namely a radial arrangement of the chromosome territories with centromeres attached to the nucleoli, which adopt the compact fibrillar structure of nucleolar precursor bodies (NPBs). Subsequently, during the second cycle, the cloned embryos undergo further reorganization with the establishment of new chromocenters, clustered in one part of the nucleus, as during normal embryogenesis. We could also establish that the adequate distribution of chromosomal territories at the pronuclear stage seems important for the development until blastocyst

    Outils et leviers pour favoriser le développement d'une génétique adaptée aux enjeux de l'agro-écologie pour les élevages de ruminants

    No full text
    National audienceDans le cadre du Projet Agro-Ecologique pour la France, la prĂ©sente Ă©tude a Ă©tĂ© conduite afin de dĂ©terminer les « Outils et leviers pour favoriser le dĂ©veloppement d’une gĂ©nĂ©tique animale adaptĂ©e aux enjeux de l’agro-Ă©cologie (AE) ». AprĂšs une Ă©tude bibliographique portant sur les critĂšres de performance au regard des enjeux de l’AE, et un Ă©tat des lieux des Ă©volutions passĂ©es ou en cours de l’offre gĂ©nĂ©tique, une enquĂȘte tĂ©lĂ©phonique auprĂšs de 37 Ă©leveurs et un groupe d’éleveurs, en ruminants et engagĂ©s dans une dĂ©marche AE sur leur exploitation, a Ă©tĂ© rĂ©alisĂ©e afin de recueillir leur vision de la gĂ©nĂ©tique, leurs attentes et besoins, et leurs propositions pour l’avenir. Une synthĂšse de ces Ă©lĂ©ments a conduit Ă  des recommandations. Les dispositifs de sĂ©lection actuels apportent dĂ©jĂ  des rĂ©ponses aux Ă©leveurs de ruminants engagĂ©s dans des dĂ©marches AE (3/4 des enquĂȘtĂ©s considĂšrent que l’offre gĂ©nĂ©tique actuelle leur permet une conduite d’élevage en adĂ©quation avec les principes de l’AE), grĂące Ă  la diversitĂ© gĂ©nĂ©tique des reproducteurs disponibles, et Ă  l’évolution des objectifs de sĂ©lection. NĂ©anmoins ces dispositifs doivent Ă©voluer significativement en intĂ©grant : 1) une orientation vers plus de robustesse, santĂ© et efficacitĂ© alimentaire, en encourageant une approche multicritĂšres ; 2) une meilleure connaissance et une prise en compte de l’adaptation des gĂ©notypes Ă  diffĂ©rents milieux d’élevage, dans les diffĂ©rentes races et croisements, 3) un certain degrĂ© de « personnalisation » du tri des reproducteurs afin de proposer le meilleur compromis entre conditions d’élevage – animaux – objectifs de l’éleveur et de sa filiĂšr

    From congenial paralysis to post-early brain injury developmental condition: Where does cerebral palsy actually stand?

    Get PDF
    Cerebral palsy (CP), an umbrella term for a developmental motor disorder caused by early brain injury (EBI)/interference, remains debated. In this essay, we present a narrative, beginning with the original anatomical-clinical description of the so-called paralysie congéniale (congenial paralysis) by the French psychiatrist Jean-Baptiste Cazauvieilh. We then discuss how the concept has evolved over the last 2 centuries. We aim to illustrate these ideas with the biopsychosocial model of health, especially in light of the current neuroscientific and sociological knowledge of human development. We endeavour to integrate 3 connected but distinct entities: (1) the EBI as a seminal turning point of the individual's story; (2) the clinical findings we call CP, when motor impairment and activity limitation related to post-EBI (or other early non-progressive brain interference) appears, and; (3) a post-EBI developmental condition that encompasses the overall consequences of an EBI. This framework should guide individual, familial and collective care discussions and research strategies beyond the scope of CP

    Review: Towards the agroecological management of ruminants, pigs and poultry through the development of sustainable breeding programmes. II. Breeding strategies

    No full text
    Agroecology uses ecological processes and local resources rather than chemical inputs to develop productive and resilient livestock and crop production systems. In this context, breeding innovations are necessary to obtain animals that are both productive and adapted to a broad range of local contexts and diversity of systems. Breeding strategies to promote agroecological systems are similar for different animal species. However, current practices differ regarding the breeding of ruminants, pigs and poultry. Ruminant breeding is still an open system where farmers continue to choose their own breeds and strategies. Conversely, pig and poultry breeding is more or less the exclusive domain of international breeding companies which supply farmers with hybrid animals. Innovations in breeding strategies must therefore be adapted to the different species. In developed countries, reorienting current breeding programmes seems to be more effective than developing programmes dedicated to agroecological systems that will struggle to be really effective because of the small size of the populations currently concerned by such systems. Particular attention needs to be paid to determining the respective usefulness of cross-breeding v. straight breeding strategies of welladapted local breeds. While cross-breeding may offer some immediate benefits in terms of improving certain traits that enable the animals to adapt well to local environmental conditions, it may be difficult to sustain these benefits in the longer term and could also induce an important loss of genetic diversity if the initial pure-bred populations are no longer produced. As well as supporting the value of within-breed diversity, we must preserve between-breed diversity in order to maintain numerous options for adaptation to a variety of production environments and contexts. This may involve specific public policies to maintain and characterize local breeds (in terms of both phenotypes and genotypes), which could be used more effectively if they benefited from the scientific and technical resources currently available for more common breeds. Last but not least, public policies need to enable improved information concerning the genetic resources and breeding tools available for the agroecological management of livestock production systems, and facilitate its assimilation by farmers and farm technicians

    Review: Towards the agroecological management of ruminants, pigs and poultry through the development of sustainable breeding programmes: I-selection goals and criteria

    No full text
    Agroecology uses natural processes and local resources rather than chemical inputs to ensure production while limiting the environmental footprint of livestock and crop production systems. Selecting to achieve a maximization of target production criteria has long proved detrimental to fitness traits. However, since the 1990s, developments in animal breeding have also focussed on animal robustness by balancing production and functional traits within overall breeding goals. We discuss here how an agroecological perspective should further shift breeding goals towards functional traits rather than production traits. Breeding for robustness aims to promote individual adaptive capacities by considering diverse selection criteria which include reproduction, animal health and welfare, and adaptation to rough feed resources, a warm climate or fluctuating environmental conditions. It requires the consideration of genotype × environment interactions in the prediction of breeding values. Animal performance must be evaluated in low-input systems in order to select those animals that are adapted to limiting conditions, including feed and water availability, climate variations and diseases. Finally, we argue that there is no single agroecological animal type, but animals with a variety of profiles that can meet the expectations of agroecology. The standardization of both animals and breeding conditions indeed appears contradictory to the agroecological paradigm that calls for an adaptation of animals to local opportunities and constraints in weakly artificialized systems tied to their physical environment

    Outils et leviers pour favoriser le dĂ©veloppement d'une gĂ©nĂ©tique animale adaptĂ©e aux enjeux de l'agroĂ©cologie: Rapport final de l’étude n° SSP-2014-061

    No full text
    Le nĂ©ologisme « agro-Ă©cologie » est apparu dans la littĂ©rature dans les annĂ©es 30, d’abord pour dĂ©signer une discipline scientifique au carrefour de l’écologie et de l’agronomie, puis Ă  partir des annĂ©es 70 un ensemble de pratiques et un mouvement social en rĂ©action Ă  l’intensification de l’agriculture (Wezel et al., 2009). Francis et al. (2003) ont encore Ă©largi cette dĂ©finition en considĂ©rant l’ensemble des dimensions environnementales et socio-Ă©conomiques Ă  l’échelle des filiĂšres. Dans son acception scientifique, qui est l’angle choisi dans cette Ă©tude, l’agro-Ă©cologie se dĂ©finit comme l’application des concepts et principes de l’écologie Ă  la conception et Ă  la gestion d’agroĂ©cosystĂšmes durables. La question du bouclage des cycles pour limiter les intrants et les pollutions par une meilleure rĂ©utilisation des sorties des diffĂ©rents ateliers est au coeur de ces problĂ©matiques. On vise Ă©galement un recours accru Ă  des rĂ©gulations biologiques et Ă©cologiques que l’on cherche Ă  piloter au mieux des attendus de l’élevage. Ceci implique de prendre en compte la diversitĂ© biologique Ă  tous ses niveaux d'organisation, de comprendre et d’utiliser les capacitĂ©s adaptatives des animaux et les interactions biotiques dans les agroĂ©cosystĂšmes, en considĂ©rant les systĂšmes de culture ou les systĂšmes d'Ă©levage comme des Ă©cosystĂšmes particuliers (Dumont et al. 2013). Ainsi, l’agro-Ă©cologie s’inscrit-elle dans un mouvement de fond autour du « Comment produire autrement ? » dans des systĂšmes de production dont on cherche Ă  concilier les performances techniques, environnementales, Ă©conomiques et sociales. LancĂ© le 18 dĂ©cembre 2012, le Projet Agro-Ecologique pour la France (PAEF) vise Ă  conjuguer l’ensemble de ces performances tant au niveau de l'exploitation qu’au niveau collectif (territoires, filiĂšres, etc.). Il s’agit d’engager une Ă©volution des systĂšmes de production, qui remette l’agronomie au coeur des pratiques, pour combiner ces diffĂ©rentes performances. La Loi n° 2014-1170 du 13 octobre 2014 dite Loi d'avenir pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et la forĂȘt en donne la dĂ©finition suivante : « Les politiques publiques visent Ă  promouvoir et Ă  pĂ©renniser les systĂšmes de production agro-Ă©cologiques, dont le mode de production biologique, qui combinent performance Ă©conomique, sociale, notamment au travers d’un haut niveau de protection sociale, environnementale et sanitaire. Ces systĂšmes privilĂ©gient l'autonomie des exploitations agricoles et l'amĂ©lioration de leur compĂ©titivitĂ©, en maintenant ou en augmentant la rentabilitĂ© Ă©conomique, en amĂ©liorant la valeur ajoutĂ©e des productions et en rĂ©duisant la consommation d'Ă©nergie, d'eau, d'engrais, de produits phytopharmaceutiques et de mĂ©dicaments vĂ©tĂ©rinaires, en particulier les antibiotiques. Ils sont fondĂ©s sur les interactions biologiques et l'utilisation des services Ă©cosystĂ©miques et des potentiels offerts par les ressources naturelles, en particulier les ressources en eau, la biodiversitĂ©, la photosynthĂšse, les sols et l'air, en maintenant leur capacitĂ© de renouvellement du point de vue qualitatif et quantitatif. Ils contribuent Ă  l'attĂ©nuation et Ă  l'adaptation aux effets du changement climatique
    corecore